Congo, By and For the Congolese: Comparing Congolese and Western Perspectives Through the Lens of Mineral Exploitation
Abstract
Although the West has turned its attention to the crisis in Eastern DR Congo (DRC), the advocacy movement lacks strong engagement with Congolese perspectives on the broader issues. Through qualitative research with Congolese in the DRC and the diaspora, this paper seeks to identify common threads among Congolese perspectives. The emerging consensus suggests that tougher legislation on conflict minerals is constructive, but that the West must be guided by Congolese perspectives on the following issues: pressure on the Congolese government to battle corruption and pursue a just and lasting democratic process, unjust mining contracts with multinationals in Katanga province, foreign policies on Rwanda and Uganda, and a comprehensive approach to issues which underlie sexual violence. It will be years before US conflict minerals legislation directly impacts the DRC. Thus, the West must act now in other ways to use its far-reaching power for the benefit of the Congolese.
Contents
Introduction: Lumumba and the west
Defining intelligentsia
Thesis and methodology
The rape of the Congo. Congolese perspectives
Mineral exploitation in Eastern DRC: What is the solution?. The struggle over an approach to conflict minerals; Congolese perspectives; Policy debate in Washington
Whose eyes are on Katanga?
Governance and corruption. Dubious contracts; Congolese perspectives on good governance in DRC
Congolese anger and western defensiveness
Western vs. Congolese perspectives on sexual violence in eastern DRC
The Congolese and two neighbors
Congolese nationalism
Conclusion
Original item type
Microsoft Word (DOC)
Original extent
108 pages
Collections
Copyright
This original work is protected by copyright. Copyright is retained by the author(s). Works may be viewed, downloaded, or printed, but not reproduced or distributed without author(s) permission.