Legitimizing Local Leadership In Interfaith Relief and Development
Abstract
The traditional methods of 20th century Western aid have proven ineffective. In addition to persistent poverty and disease, 21st century relief and development efforts face global environmental changes, the impact of globalization, and rapid growth in non-Western nations. Modern methods must respect indigenous culture and legitimize local leadership in order to be effective and sustainable. World religions in particular, and the variety of practices and interpretations within each of them, must be incorporated for needs and priorities to be accurately determined. Common ground in ethics, with each remaining true to the core values of his/her faith, must be found in order to live and problem-solve together.
Contents
Traditional/20th Century Methods. Western Responsibility; Short-Term vs. Long-Term Methods; No Strings Attached
21st Century Issues. The Environment; Globalization; Non-Western Power
Legitimizing Local Leadership. Local Capacity; Local Knowledge; Local Initiative; Local Imperfection; Locals and Democracy
Interfaith Leadership. Principles for Discussing Religion; Religion in Development; FBO’s and Religious Service; Religion as Identity; World Faiths and Global Justice; Religion as Motivation; Limitations of Religious Leadership; Defining a Global Ethic
Practical Application. Scenario 1; Scenario 2
Original item type
Microsoft Word (DOCX)
Original extent
44 pages
Collections
Copyright
This original work is protected by copyright. Copyright is retained by the author(s). Works may be viewed, downloaded, or printed, but not reproduced or distributed without author(s) permission.
Maintained by the Northwest University Library