Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Lisaen
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-02T22:34:36Z
dc.date.available2017-10-02T22:34:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-07en
dc.identifier.uriarchives.northwestu.edu/handle/nu/25699
dc.description.abstractThere is much debate as to which instructional strategy works best regarding reading instruction. It was my intention to better understand whether using an implicit or explicit instructional strategy is more beneficial when teaching reading comprehension. An explicit instructional strategy is similar to a direct instruction approach where students anticipate a goal to focus on while reading. Implicit instructional strategies use more of an organic approach to highlight comprehension skills as they naturally come up in reading. To answer this question I used a Quasi-experimental design for this Quantitative research. The results indicated when comparing each group’s scores (pre and posttest) the implicit instructional strategy resulted in significant numbers and thus proving that this strategy was more beneficial for kids and ultimately answered my question.en
dc.format.extentii, 23 pagesen
dc.format.mediumPDFen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNorthwest Universityen
dc.rightsThis original work is protected by copyright. Copyright is retained by the author(s). Works may be viewed, downloaded, or printed, but not reproduced or distributed without author(s) permission.en
dc.rights.urihttp://archives.northwestu.edu/page/copyrighten
dc.subjectEnglish Lanugage Arts (ELA)en
dc.titleImplicit vs. Explicit Instructional Strategies Regarding Reading Comprehensionen
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Educationen
thesis.degree.levelMastersen
thesis.degree.grantorNorthwest Universityen
thesis.degree.disciplineCollege of Educationen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record