Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Nathanen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T19:24:36Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T19:24:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-12en
dc.identifier.uriarchives.northwestu.edu/handle/nu/57406
dc.descriptionArticle published in the 2016 Harvest Journal.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to tease out the issues associated with the debate on eternal security, linking the viewpoints to corresponding understandings of human free moral agency and the sovereignty of God. This paper dives most deeply into the divide between classical Arminianism and classical Calvinism. Because the author is more familiar with Arminian theology, this presentation includes a wider critique of Calvinism but does not fail to turn the mirror of criticism on Arminianism as well. This paper advocates for a theological middle ground, one that grants man legitimate freedoms but does not fail to support the sovereign nature of our God. Advocates from a number of positions around the circle of debate are given entrance into the proverbial ring in order to bring diversity yet clarity to the discussion.en
dc.format.extent2 pagesen
dc.format.mediumWebpageen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNorthwest Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNU Harvest Journalen
dc.rightsThis original work is protected by copyright. Copyright is retained by the author(s). Works may be viewed, downloaded, or printed, but not reproduced or distributed without author(s) permission.en
dc.rights.urihttp://archives.northwestu.edu/page/copyrighten
dc.source.urihttps://nuharvestjournal.org/harvest2016/2016/12/12/free-will-or-sovereignty-conflicting-views-on-eternal-securityen
dc.subjectFree will and determinismen
dc.subjectFuture lifeen
dc.titleFree Will or Sovereignty: Conflicting Views on Eternal Securityen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record